Treponemal Syphilis
The fundamental principle of a treponemal test is that it detects antibodies directed specifically against antigens of the Treponema pallidum bacterium itself. Unlike nontreponemal tests that detect a non-specific surrogate marker (reagin), these assays are designed to be highly specific. Their primary role in the traditional testing algorithm is to confirm that a reactive RPR result is a true positive due to a syphilis infection and not a biological false positive
The most critical concept to understand about treponemal tests is this: once a person is infected with syphilis, the antibodies detected by these tests will typically remain present for the rest of their life, regardless of successful treatment. They create a permanent “serological scar.” This means they cannot be used to monitor response to therapy or to distinguish between an active infection and a past, cured infection
Classic Confirmatory Methods
These are the historical gold standards. While largely replaced by automated methods in high-volume labs, the principles are essential to know, and they are still used in some reference labs
1. Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS)
This was the first widely used confirmatory test and is a classic example of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA)
- The Principle: This test visually detects if a patient’s antibody can bind to whole, fixed T. pallidum organisms on a microscope slide
-
The Reagents
- Antigen Slide: A microscope slide with fixed spirochetes of the Nichols strain of T. pallidum
- Sorbent: A diluent containing an extract of non-pathogenic treponemes. This is the critical “absorption” step. It is used to pre-treat the patient’s serum to remove any non-specific, cross-reacting antibodies that might bind to common antigens shared by other spirochetes. This dramatically increases the test’s specificity
- Conjugate: A fluorescein-labeled anti-human immunoglobulin
-
The Procedure
- Patient serum is pre-treated with the sorbent
- The absorbed serum is incubated on the antigen slide. If anti-T. pallidum antibodies are present, they will bind to the spirochetes
- The slide is washed, and the fluorescent conjugate is added. It binds to the patient’s antibodies
- The slide is washed again and viewed under a fluorescent microscope
-
Reading the Result
- Reactive: The spirochetes will glow a distinct apple-green
- Nonreactive: The spirochetes will be invisible or appear as faint, red outlines (due to the counterstain)
- Limitations: Highly subjective, technically demanding, and labor-intensive. Reading requires significant expertise
2. T. pallidum Particle Agglutination (TP-PA) & MHATP
This category of tests, including the Microhemagglutination Assay for T. pallidum (MHATP), replaced the FTA-ABS as the confirmatory test of choice for many years because they are much easier to perform and read
- The Principle: This is a passive agglutination assay. We are using microscopic particles as carriers for the treponemal antigens
-
The Reagents
- Antigen Particles: Gelatin particles (in TP-PA) or red blood cells (in MHATP) that have been coated with antigens extracted from T. pallidum
- Control Particles: Particles coated with no treponemal antigens, used to check for non-specific agglutination
-
The Procedure
- The patient’s diluted serum is added to the wells of a microtiter plate containing the antigen-coated particles
- If the patient’s serum contains specific anti-treponemal antibodies, they will bind to the antigens on multiple particles, cross-linking them and forming a lattice structure
- The plate is incubated, allowing the particles to settle
-
Reading the Result: The interpretation is based on the settling pattern in the U-bottom well
- Reactive: The cross-linked particles form a smooth, flat “mat” or “lawn” covering the bottom of the well
- Nonreactive: The particles are not cross-linked, so they roll down the sides of the well and form a tight, compact “button” or ring at the bottom
- Advantages: Objective, easy-to-read endpoint. More specific than early FTA-ABS tests
Modern Automated Treponemal Tests: EIA and CLIA
These are the methods that dominate modern syphilis testing, especially in the context of the “reverse algorithm.”
- The Principle: These are Enzyme Immunoassays (EIA) or Chemiluminescence Immunoassays (CLIA) performed on high-throughput automated analyzers. They use recombinant T. pallidum antigens (specific proteins like TpN17 and TpN47) rather than whole bacterial extracts, which further improves specificity
- The Procedure: The format is typically a sandwich or capture ELISA. For example, wells of a plate or microbeads are coated with treponemal antigens. Patient serum is added, and if specific antibodies are present, they bind. An enzyme-labeled secondary antibody is then added, followed by a substrate that produces a measurable color (EIA) or light (CLIA) signal
-
Advantages
- Automation: Can be fully automated for high-volume screening
- Objectivity: Results are read by a spectrophotometer or luminometer, eliminating subjective interpretation
- High Sensitivity: Can detect very low levels of antibody, making them excellent screening tools
- Role in the Reverse Algorithm: Because these tests are so sensitive and automatable, many labs now use a treponemal EIA/CLIA as their initial screening test. If it is reactive, they then perform a quantitative RPR to determine the disease’s activity and titer. This approach is better at detecting very early or old, latent syphilis but can create confusing results (e.g., Trep +, RPR -) that require further testing
Putting It All Together: The Clinical Interpretation
The power of syphilis serology comes from using nontreponemal and treponemal tests together
- RPR Reactive, TP-PA Reactive: Consistent with an active or recent, untreated syphilis infection
-
RPR Nonreactive, TP-PA Reactive: This is a classic pattern. It usually means one of two things:
- A successfully treated past infection. The RPR became nonreactive after treatment, but the treponemal antibody “scar” remains
- Very early or very late-stage syphilis, where the reagin response is weak or absent
- RPR Reactive, TP-PA Nonreactive: This indicates a biological false positive RPR. The patient does not have syphilis; their reactive RPR is due to another condition (like lupus or pregnancy). This perfectly illustrates the confirmatory role of the treponemal test